[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Referral results sent with an empty scope and filter

To: ando@sys-net.it
Subject: Re: Referral results sent with an empty scope and filter
From: Damiano Albani <damiano.albani@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:07:42 +0100
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Content-disposition: inline
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CTh7zz3Imko25e2Yk1n5Di7W605SmjiP0xyxR+OJicxTwh1X0AR2N9ObvNRH6tdP7F64uufVY3PU8Cy/mlO0ip9sQ6D9RQURuxMRVlLi4a1ZZc4+SojJHD+SOFvE2k4PkzjJWbcxbCJV1KM73KPeWkLwWSCEcCm5WFMzih2Xfk4=
In-reply-to: <2d1ecb7b0601120851r7d865358y2fec3a03e374edbc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2d1ecb7b0601120123g3f4b4647p8c39274bd997184a@mail.gmail.com> <43365.131.175.154.56.1137081691.squirrel@131.175.154.56> <2d1ecb7b0601120851r7d865358y2fec3a03e374edbc@mail.gmail.com>

On 1/12/06, Damiano Albani <damiano.albani@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Which version 2.2.26 *doesn't* do apparently... ("??" instead of
> "??sub" in the reference reply).

Forget it, I must be tired, my eyes have played a trick on me :-)
The reference response sent by OpenLDAP 2.2.26 does end in "??sub",
which is totally correct regarding to RFC 3296.

Sorry for the noise! :p

--
Damiano ALBANI

References:
- Referral results sent with an empty scope and filter
  - From: Damiano Albani <damiano.albani@gmail.com>
- Re: Referral results sent with an empty scope and filter
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>
- Re: Referral results sent with an empty scope and filter
  - From: Damiano Albani <damiano.albani@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (Was ITS#4333) crash in back meta
Next by Date: Berkeley DB versions
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread